Pyramid in Egypt

Little hard to see

Awesome level!

Thank you

Nice puzzle in starting really liked it but after that it's very hidden to find the intended solution...Btw it reminds me of my first level posted on this forum Pyramid of Egypt THANKS FOR SHARING

I tried your level @Adiorama, Pyramid of Egypt, (As far as I understood, this was your first level) . it was interesting and beautiful!

The level is very cool! But there is one big problem - after the first part "traffic" is very hard to see!! Even knowing the right way, I run into the same problem every time: it's very hard to hit the head of the first RP column. In the future, please don't make such uncomfortable places. Think about the convenience and comfort of the players, otherwise a very good level (such as this one) may be missed by the players!

I really like your original traffic - the first part of the level. There are a lot of traffic levels on the forum, but you made an original design and the puzzle is really cool!! Despite the hidden - your route for B is very interesting and varied, I really liked it. Although I don't really like the Z levels. But I managed and it was interesting. The route through the pyramid is very intriguing and interesting.

Despite the hidden I really want to give you 5, because the level deserves it (only for the first part of the traffic you can already put 5). But in the future, please do not make such uncomfortable places - make more visibility!

Thanks for the rating, yes I know that I made a mistake with that part of the level, and I agree that this is a big problem. Sorry. As for the first part of the level, I did it for an hour and a half, and I myself barely passed my level

First part, (I mean the sliding pieces puzzle) was supposed to be solved? I tried but I couldn't find a solution to get to the other side, so i supposed it was a tricky mislead by the author and solved the level by:

Spoiler

pushing B outside to the left using one of the sliding triangles

First part there should have been a solution, but you found another solution, and another mistake of mine
Thank you, @Javifeo.