Above

I gave up too annoying to be fun.

EDIT - I'll rephrase my statement. I see that B must walk with the two P above - not sure if the top bot will get off after that but lets assume so. There is only one place to get the two Ps on to B but at the other end is a trap. One P can get up there and get on B but not both. So I can't see the game play to execute it.

Nice clean logic level & harder than it seems due to the traps...Thanks for sharing @Baba

@Meko Guy I have made a video of my solution so that you can compare with your gameplay ... I don't know if it is the intended solution but I think it will be close and was stable enough...look at this...

Spoiler: My solution

@delator77 - Very good - I was going the other way and like I said - didn't see the game play.

@delator77 - Forgot to mention. I don't think the P on P and P get off where B starts was the intended gameplay. I'm thinking the P stack needed to go the other way while B prevented sometimes as per the description. Yours works and it's less risk plus less work.

@Meko Guy lets see what @Baba says about the intended way

@Meko Guy thanks for playing and for the review ... if you pile up P at the start and leave ... it's my fault for making a description (B had to do something, B did that only at the beginning) Sorry ... and because you didn't see full stacking way because of the focus on the trap

@delator77 Thank you for playing and for the video ... the difference is in the variety of gameplay ...

Spoiler: P on P

Fun easy level. I used same gameplay as @delator77

@Baba - You are right - focus. I think I can win this level without the ball now that I seen the path to the win.

I won without the ball. I used my annoying move above to get P around to the other side where the win trap was. P normally would fall off in the corner for some reason but I did get P all the way around and walked down the stairs onto B but couldn't get the other P on them. @delator77's route to the win opened up this opportunity. Knowing P would probably fall off, I used that.

Spoiler: Another way

@Meko Guy thank you very much, you really showed your solution in the gameplay ... i never thought of a solution without a ball while testing before ...

So many options...but I was trying to do P on P stack from beginning which was very unstable as top P would dismount everywhere!
Thank goodness for the offered video solutions
Challenging and entertaining level

Spoiler: VS (v1.6.2)