1. Announcing Mekorama on the Web!

    Now anyone can play levels from the forum online, with one click!

    Dismiss Notice
  2. Psst! If you're new here, welcome! Please visit these pages first for information about the forum and Mekorama:

    Welcome! ¡Bienvenido! Selamat datang! Добро пожаловать! Willkommen!
    and
    Everything you want to know about Mekorama

    Dismiss Notice

Organization Too many "junk" levels being uploaded - please weed out

Discussion in 'General (Issues, Help, Discussions)' started by Sunny Sunset, May 29, 2016.

Tags:
  1. Sunny Sunset

    Sunny Sunset Active Member

    Messages:
    195
    Levels:
    23
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    254
    Joined:
    May 23, 2016
    I keep running across levels that are unplayable. It is a waste of our time to download, scan, and then discover the level is impossible, or DELIBERATELY DESIGNED TO BE UNPLAYABLE because they are simply examples of some odd physics that other creators may be interested in. Not everyone wishes to be a creator, they just want to play legitimate levels…

    These unplayable examples need to be posted in a different area other than in the new level section, because they are not even intended to be a new levels. Personal Album names are uselessly vague. Example: what does PutPut mean? It has several "junk" levels as described below.

    People are posting levels that have:
    No flag at all
    No legitimate path to get to the flag
    No controllable B bot
    Not enough time allowed when starting the level to even make the first move, or spin of the map, before the level collapses, B gets zapped, or something falls.

    They are also posting levels that use "cop-out ways" to beat the level. These include flinging a bot or a block piece around in mid-air to hit the flag, or setting up a bot to automatically hit the flag without help. Yes, this is a cop-out by those who have no actual plan to connect their creative modules together by a legitimate path from start to finish... So they just fling things

    There have also been quite a number of levels that use BALLS (or bots) that you hit to reach the goal flag. Generally, no bot required. However, these levels, while creative and original, are often unplayable as well, because the motors used to hit the balls are sluggish at best, and often uncontrollable, with questionable trajectories. The more motors used, the worse it gets. The pinball and multi-ball games are horrible!

    I propose the following solutions:

    New top-level tabs (next to LEVELS) should be created for:

    UNPLAYABLE EXAMPLES
    BALL GAMES (this would also include ones like"High Man" who is hit into the water toward a tiny goal flag)
    FLING THINGS

    Creators will be responsible for putting their levels in the correct categories.

    All new levels to be vetted/moderated/curated before placing them out in public.
    (With the exception of the UNPLAYABLE EXAMPLES category, since the creator is usually aware that there is something a bit messed up, or just weird, that he wants to show us)

    And anything without a goal flag, at least 1 controllable B bot, or a legitimate path should be returned to the creator to fix the error. (An eye, or a head, should be placed on B bot)

    Possibly rename LEVELS to BONUS LEVELS to reflect the cream of the crop... Those that are truly deserving of being a part of Mekorama, ones that even Martin himself would be proud to include... ;)

    And there's my rant… :)

    In the meantime anything that fits an unplayable, or fling thing, level will get a one star rating from me. I'd like to suggest that others rate these unplayables as one star as well, so that those people who are not interested in being creators, can have legitimate BONUS levels to download and play without feeling frustrated by so many "junk" levels.
     
    Mister M likes this.
  2. richardfu

    richardfu Moderator

    Messages:
    99
    Levels:
    50
    Albums:
    2
    Likes Received:
    677
    Joined:
    May 23, 2016
    There were fling levels and no-B-bot levels in the original game. There's nothing wrong with them.
    Anyway, I would mostly disagree with this post.
     
  3. JorgeTS

    JorgeTS New Member

    Messages:
    20
    Levels:
    12
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    18
    Joined:
    May 28, 2016
    I have done a ball level (without robots) but it is playable. The fact that there isn't robots doesn't make the level a junk level.
     
  4. cre8iv.life

    cre8iv.life New Member

    Messages:
    1
    Levels:
    11
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    11
    Joined:
    May 31, 2016
    I do not think some tags deserve a lower rating based solely on the type of game. I personally enjoy levels that incorporate all of the possible game physics no matter how whimsical the level may be. For me, I rate levels on their creativity, originality, overall attention to detail and solvability.

    To be transparent, I've made a handful of levels using balls, flinging and flying, so I understand I have a particular view on this. However, I do believe my levels are playable and somewhat challenging with a specific solution.

    I do agree that a tag denoting "concept" or "development" levels would be useful. I enjoy creating levels and have found these posts interesting and helpful.
     
    JorgeTS likes this.
  5. Sunny Sunset

    Sunny Sunset Active Member

    Messages:
    195
    Levels:
    23
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    254
    Joined:
    May 23, 2016
    Correct....but it does make it a BALL level, which means it is less of a puzzle level and more of a skill/precision level, likely with difficult to maneuver mechanisms, and therefore needs to be separated out.

    Playable means BEATABLE...as in, it needs a goal flag. If no goal flag, it's a junk level, since there's no point to it, no ending, no closure.
     
  6. Sunny Sunset

    Sunny Sunset Active Member

    Messages:
    195
    Levels:
    23
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    254
    Joined:
    May 23, 2016
    My first criteria in rating is...is there a goal flag...and is it solvable. Is it solvable by a viable path, or is there a way to cheat and solve, such as by flinging instead? FLING levels tend to get lower ratings, because it shows lack of logical thinking by the creator, in my opinion. Flinging is an option, that's mentioned, so that it can be fixed.

    My next consideration is maneuverability of hitting mechanisms, especially if it has balls (I am finding out that I cannot move a ball with a yellow bot, no matter how many times I run around it, run into it, back and forth, etc. I simply cannot move a ball with a yellow bot...it's a waste of my time to try. If there's no other mechanism to move the ball then a yellow bot... You get one star for lack of playability/solvability
     
  7. JorgeTS

    JorgeTS New Member

    Messages:
    20
    Levels:
    12
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    18
    Joined:
    May 28, 2016
    Look at my level. It's totally a puzzle. You don't need skill, just think.
     
  8. Sunny Sunset

    Sunny Sunset Active Member

    Messages:
    195
    Levels:
    23
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    254
    Joined:
    May 23, 2016
    Which level are you referring to? You have 9.

    Also, it sounds if you are getting emotionally involved in this discussion, and like you are taking this personally. that's probably not a good thing. This is only a game, nothing to get upset about, but making sure that levels are playable and categorized appropriately should not become a personal issue, as it is good for everyone.
     
    Last edited: Jun 1, 2016
  9. Lyonshost.com

    Lyonshost.com New Member

    Messages:
    6
    Levels:
    14
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    14
    Joined:
    May 28, 2016
    I'm new, but I've tested everything that I've posted. Every one has a valid solution, or more than one.
     
  10. Sunny Sunset

    Sunny Sunset Active Member

    Messages:
    195
    Levels:
    23
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    254
    Joined:
    May 23, 2016
    No problem then… I'm really only suggesting that we categorize things a little better, that's all
     
  11. retrograde

    retrograde Active Member

    Messages:
    19
    Levels:
    37
    Albums:
    2
    Likes Received:
    264
    Joined:
    May 24, 2016
    There are a number of very cool "Puzzle Box" style levels which don't have Win block visible initially. See: http://i2.wp.com/www.appunwrapper.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/img_2867.jpg . I'm not personally tied to having to see the Win block at the start, as long a draggable block is visible I'll try the level if it looks interesting.

    I agree that there is profusion of skill based levels in the forum, but that's some people's cut of tea. While I definitely enjoy the variety of level styles possible with Mekorama, I personally prefer puzzle type levels and avoid the trick shot and gauntlet run ones.

    Here are some rough categories of levels:
    • Skill Based Variants: Requires precision and/or timing to solve.
      • Trick Shot: Precision oriented. Requires launching balls or bots towards a specific targets.
      • Gauntlet Run: Timing oriented. Requires maneuvering B-Bot along a path fought with peril, namely zappers (potentially on Bots) and/or autonomous moving blocks.
    • Puzzle Based Variants: Requires observation, brain power, and a bit of trial & error to solve.
      • Puzzle Path: Involves getting a bot to the Win block by interacting with movable blocks and/or other bots. Both the bot and Win blocks are usually visible at the start, but not always.
      • Puzzle Box : Usually no Win block and/or bots visible. To solve one must open the "box" by manipulating movable blocks to locate the hidden Win block. May not have a B-Bot.
      • Botless: No bots. These are full of movable blocks. The Win button must be hit with a movable block. The Win block may or may not be visible at the start.
    • Combo Variants: Levels with a mix of skill and puzzle components.
    There is really no right or wrong type, just different styles, and different people prefer different mechanics. All styles too can be implemented well or badly. Granted it's pretty easy to make a junk level. It really takes practice, and a lot of misfires to design a good one. So I would expect the junk to gem level ratio to be pretty high.

    With regards to solvability, I've seen very few levels which actually don't have a Win block. They are indeed there but the percentage is pretty small.

    I like a how a lot of level creators will take a screenshot which includes the red solved seal. This gives some sense that the level is solvable, though the seal can certainly be photoshopped in.

    Martin should release new vetted level packs for say $1 a set (e.g. hard pack, puzzle pack, skill pack, etc.). I'm sure people would be be willing to contribute levels for free.
     
    Last edited: Jun 1, 2016
    mothproof and meko like this.
  12. CKayKay

    CKayKay New Member

    Messages:
    11
    Levels:
    3
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    16
    Joined:
    May 30, 2016
    I personally liked High Man, my grandson loved it!
    But I agree about any game that's unsolveable or solveable with a single tap on the flag shouldn't even be here...those are practice runs for a creator, I myself have made single tap levels just to play with a concept...but I would never post them here - they should be considered unfinished levels, not ready for prime time.... Just my two cents...
     
  13. Sunny Sunset

    Sunny Sunset Active Member

    Messages:
    195
    Levels:
    23
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    254
    Joined:
    May 23, 2016
    I
    I like "high man", too. I still haven't hit the flag… that totally escapes me
    But I take out my frustration by squishing him under the platform and trying to get him to squirt out and drown ;)
     
  14. Sunny Sunset

    Sunny Sunset Active Member

    Messages:
    195
    Levels:
    23
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    254
    Joined:
    May 23, 2016
    Good ideas!
    There have been quite a lot of unplayable winless levels in the first weeks… and the reason the percentages fairly low now is that i give one-star so often that they get deleted, revised, and reuploaded. I wouldn't be a bit surprised if people dread seeing my name on their rating alerts… Sorry about that folks…it's nothing personal...even though one person probably thinks I'm picking on him… But I'm really not. :)

    I don't mind not being able to see a flag… Whether I can see it or not is irrelevant, I just need to know it's there, somewhere. Seeing a checkmark on the level tells me that is beatable even if I can't see the flag. However I'm very wary of those without checkmarks, and I'm not willing to waste my time because I've run across so many junk levels that didn't have them, either hidden or otherwise.

    We forgot:
    "flailing snakes and monsters" Those are the tall towers that fall over and then spin around the board while you try to run a pattern. Sort of a "random gauntlet" I guess. I hate those.

    "practice/tutorial" levels that ckaykay mentioned. Those would be different from developer levels that are just trying to show cool physics in a non-playable manner. but these would be little, super easy playable levels that beginners need to cut their teeth on before they tackle the really rough ones .

    The ones with no bots and movable blocks, tend to be really sluggish... And often use balls which make it worse

    And we still need a category for games that use BALLS. Simply because of the way balls are used, or hit or trying to push them with things that can't push them. My own "pool table" would fit that one. It does not really fit precision, its simply just got fiddly bits that can be annoying if you don't like ball games. And I don't like ball games… But I've always loved pool, and realized I could simulate a pool table... Plus it's a great pun. :)

    Remember, we can put about 10,000 cards in this game… So we need to get this issue sorted out and categorize things now, while the game is still new in there is only 40 pages of levels to work with.

    Then people can download the categories they like… And avoid the ones we don't (which for me are balls, flailing snakes, and fling things)

    It would be nice if the game also have the same categories, so that when downloaded from the website it would automatically show up in the proper page or folder in the game. I have 360 cards on a single page ...and this is was getting unwieldy at only 100. LOL

    Yes, I like the idea of $.99 vetted level packs. I don't mind if one of my levels gets into it… My name is on it, that's all that matters. I don't need any further recognition or monetary compensation.

    However I think there should be a disclaimer, or at the very least a flag on our accounts, stating that anything uploaded may be sold within the game. If we do not agree, we check a box of saying
    "NO, do not put my level in any of your packs"
    "YES, you have permission to include my levels in your packs, without any monetary compensation to me"

    Probably should get a lawyer involved for this one… I hate lawyers… But i think it's in the terms of service and the copyright/digital rights situation already within the game
     
    Last edited: Jun 1, 2016
  15. JorgeTS

    JorgeTS New Member

    Messages:
    20
    Levels:
    12
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    18
    Joined:
    May 28, 2016
    I'm nota getting emotionally. It's just that my level is an example of a puzzle level without blocks. Its name is: Fill the gaps.
     
  16. Sunny Sunset

    Sunny Sunset Active Member

    Messages:
    195
    Levels:
    23
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    254
    Joined:
    May 23, 2016
    Ah, ok. While it does come under the category of BALL levels, there is no actual hitting or pushing of a ball, which is good. It is merely a ball release, roll...and pray. ;)

    But I don't see the puzzle part. It does not seem to make any difference which ball goes first, or what order you release them in, or even if you don't release all of them....you still get enough of the gaps filled to win the game.

    So, this might go under Retrograde's combo game, but there's no skill involved...and the puzzle is not obvious or uniquely defined.

    So, I'm still leaning toward BALL, because there is no robot.
     
  17. retrograde

    retrograde Active Member

    Messages:
    19
    Levels:
    37
    Albums:
    2
    Likes Received:
    264
    Joined:
    May 24, 2016
    While there is ton of randomness introduced by the balls in your Pool Table level it's not really luck based either. With continued effort the goal will be achieved. Levels consisting of arenas packed with R-Bots that you have to muddle your way through have a somewhat similar feel. There's too a lot randomness, but with continued effort one reaches the goal. I'd classify both as being in the same boat. Maybe "Brute Force" is a more fitting label in that they don't require skill or blowing brain cells, but rather just persistence in fighting through the chaos.
     
    Sunny Sunset likes this.
  18. Sunny Sunset

    Sunny Sunset Active Member

    Messages:
    195
    Levels:
    23
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    254
    Joined:
    May 23, 2016

    That sounds like a good label to add..Brute Force...or maybe Doggedly Determined

    To quote a poem from a friend of mine, describing me a few decades ago:

    When contemplating how to be,
    one word repeats,
    "tenacity"
    --
    TAAustin 1991
     
  19. Sunny Sunset

    Sunny Sunset Active Member

    Messages:
    195
    Levels:
    23
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    254
    Joined:
    May 23, 2016
    Hmmm.
    Tenacious Chaotic Persistence

    Except the words are too long for a web tab, and invariably will be very difficult to spell for some folks. :rolleyes:
     
  20. TR O

    TR O Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    39
    Levels:
    32
    Albums:
    18
    Likes Received:
    623
    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2016
    I agree the idea of giving a way for creator to fix level.
    Besides, I think fairness is the core values of this site. Labeling stuff would kill that i guess. Different people have different feelings towards to different levels.


    Moreover, about categorizing. In some levels have hidden stuff like secret or surprise that wait people to find out. Or maybe they have mixed features. Categorizing would be a real challenge. It might probably kill the level before people even try it. However, if creators are willing to label their levels as tutorial or big challenge, then it might be an exceptional case or even need a bigger sign
    or link to help people who are looking for it.

    Regarding junk level compliant, i think there should be a way to report it instead of separate it.
     
    Last edited: Aug 19, 2016

Share This Page